Friday, November 20, 2009

Islam in Europe

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2009/11/13/world/international-uk-france-burqa-ban.html?_r=1&scp=8&sq=muslims%20in%20europe&st=cse

In this NY Times article, Reuters describes the current situation in France regarding the wearing of veils by Muslim women in public. The French parliament is considering a full-time ban of veils in public spaces. This is something that is supported by the President, Nicolas Sarkozy, but their are still many people that are against such a ban. These people include many people in parliament and also law professionals within the country. One law professor by the name of Denys de Bachillion says that putting this ban on veils would violate woman's rights because women should have the right to choose what they do or do not wear. Other professionals such as Andre Gerin believe that these veils are "walking coffins" and that it violates the woman's rights because the religion "makes" her wear such stuff. This debate ultimately leads to other issues regarding Islam in France such as immigration of Muslims into the country and also the national identity of the citizens of France.

The journal article by Tim Savage entitled "Europe and Islam: Crescents Waxing, Cultures Clashing" also talks about some of the cultural issues that European countries are facing when it comes to Islam just as France is dealing with the wearing of the veils in public spaces. Because of the type of stuff that is going on in countries around Europe, such as what was discussed above, many Muslims are starting to identify more with their religion. A large amount of discrimination exists against the Muslims in these countries and this forces them to turn to each other and their religion in order to keep going with life. Savage also talks about how many countries are trying to find their national identity and in order to do so are starting to crack down on some of the Muslim practices such as wearing veils which is what France is doing.

These two articles outline an interesting relationship between the European countries and the Muslim immigrants. The constant discrimination is something that I believe stems from mostly fear. Because more and more Muslims are moving into these European countries, the governments in these countries are trying to keep the national identity secure even though the people in the country are changing. Something that complicates this even more is the fact that Turkey wishes to join the EU which is looking to expand the European countries. Turkey is a country that is predominantly Muslim so this is something interesting to look at for the future.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Hamas

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/28/world/middleeast/28iht-letter.html?_r=1&scp=6&sq=hamas&st=cse

This article in the NY times written by Daniel Williams is about the threat that Salafism opposes to the Hamas in Palestine. In this article, Williams outlines the reasons why Salafism has become more and more popular in the Gaza Strip and thus becoming more of a threat to the Hamas. One of the reasons is that the Hamas has issued a cease fire with Israel. This is an act of giving in to the Israelis in the eyes of the Salafis. This has allowed the Salafis to whip up support against the Hamas because they are "no longer an Islamic Resistance Group". Another reason that the Salafis are gaining support is that the Hamas have become to "soft" in their eyes. In the past the Hamas have been known as a terrorist group who uses weapons to achieve its goals yet in relation to Salafism, a Hamas spokesman said that Salafism "wants to implement their own ideas through weapons, and we cannot allow that". This shows in the Salafis eyes that Hamas is no longer a group that will fight for Islam.

The journal article by Menachem Klein entitled "Hamas in Power" basically foretells the scenario played out between Salafism and Hamas. Klein describes how the Hamas had to make certain decisions in regard to its future. If it wanted to enter the political arena, Hamas realized that it had to make certain sacrifices in order to ensure that its members would be able to be elected into office. These sacrifices included moderating its political beliefs by going easy on the religious law that they pushed for and also by distancing itself from the militant and terrorist background that they had previously been accustomed to. This moderation is exactly what allowed it to get elected and take over power from the Fatah. This moderation consisted of changing their ideology to make them more electable. This change in ideology is exactly what Salafism has continually attacked in the Gaza Strip and thus made Hamas a different group in the eyes of the people whether this is for the better or worse.

After looking at both of these articles, I believe that this change made by the Hamas is something that can be built on. Even though Hamas has not fully eradicated the terrorist part of its organization in the eyes of the west, it has still become a much more legitimate part of the Palestinian government. This has ultimately made them a much better party to deal with than was thought when they came into power. The hope of some peace between them and Israel still is a long reach but can be done if the right opportunities arise. The fact that Hamas has kept some sort of order and has not allowed ultra-radical groups like Salafism to grab hold means that they are thinking coherently to some degree.